But that's not what this post is about. This post is about how a group of half a dozen of us got split from the main group at a traffic light and dropped. They didn't wait, but fortunately the area is part of many popular ride routes, so it wasn't a question of finding our way back. After a couple miles, I got antsy and upped my pace so that before long I was on my own. That made me paranoid about the traffic, which in turn made me up my pace again.
When I rolled into the parking lot with 51.75 miles and a rolling average of 16.5 mph on the computer, I was cooked. I headed over to Einstein's for the customary bagel, coffee, and post-ride visiting, during which one of the guys mentioned that we'd averaged 14.5 mph to the rest break. I said I thought that was at about 33 miles, if memory served, and my tablemates thought that was about right. That would mean that the second leg was 18.75 miles.
Now, about that algebra (Turtle! Look away!!). I was curious about my rolling average after we got separated from the group, so I trotted out the following equation:
(33 miles * 14.5 mph) + (18.75 * x)...then...
----------------------------------- = 16.5 mph overall average
51.75 miles total
(478.5) + (18.75 * x) = 853.875...and...
18.75 * x = 375.375...and finally...
x = 20.02That's, ah say, that's miles per hour, boy.
Nah... that's got to be wrong. The data must be flawed.
5 comments:
You lost me at 51.75 miles. ;-)
Because sometimes how you get there is more significant than how fast!
WV: "gecbspgb". Isn't that the lyric for some children's song? Gee-ee, see-bee, ess-pee, gee-bee...
Plus, if you don't show your work, you don't get any credit. ;-)
Perzactly.
My brain shut down at the mere suggestion of your equation. ;)
Post a Comment